Progressive Money

Topic 4 of 8

Inflation

What pushes prices up, how the RBA uses interest rates to bring inflation down, and the debate over who pays and whether there are better tools.

4 lessons · about 45 min with activities, 1 h 55 min with the long lectures · beginner first

Before the videos

Key ideas for this topic

Begin with the RBA's own explainer on the inflation target, the mainstream anchor for this topic. Then Isabella Weber's short animation, and her optional hour-long webinar, set out a contested explanation of the 2021–23 inflation, and a 2012 ABC report with Bill Mitchell questions what inflation targeting costs in jobs.

Builds on: Topics 2 and 3 showed that governments and banks can both create money; this topic asks what happens when total spending meets the economy's real limits, and why prices can rise for other reasons too.

Ideas you'll need

1Demand, supply and the price level

Inflation is a rise in the general level of prices, not just the price of one thing. In Australia it is measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks the cost of a typical basket of household spending. Over the year to December 2022 the CPI rose 7.8 per cent, the fastest since 1990.

Economists start with two ideas. Aggregate demand is total spending on Australian-produced goods and services: by households, businesses and governments, plus overseas buyers of our exports, minus the part of all that spending that goes on imports. Aggregate supply is what the economy can produce with the workers, equipment and materials it has. The level of output the economy can sustain without prices speeding up is called its potential.

When spending runs ahead of what can be produced, businesses can raise prices and still sell everything, and they compete harder for scarce workers. That is demand-pull inflation. When something makes production dearer or scarcer, such as an oil price spike or floods destroying crops, prices rise even if demand has not changed. That is cost-push inflation, or a supply shock. The RBA's own explainer on the causes of inflation uses exactly these categories.

Real episodes usually mix both. The debate in this topic is largely about how much of each was behind the 2021–23 surge.

2Expectations: why beliefs about inflation matter

Prices and wages are set by people looking ahead. If a café owner in Hamilton expects her suppliers and staff to cost 6 per cent more next year, she will lift her prices now. If workers expect prices to rise 6 per cent, they will push for pay rises to match. So what people expect inflation to be can help make it happen.

Economists call expectations anchored when people assume inflation will return to around the target whatever happens this year. Then a temporary jump, say in petrol prices, tends to fade, because nobody builds it into next year's prices and wages. If expectations become unanchored, a temporary shock can turn into lasting inflation.

This is why the RBA watches surveys of what households, businesses and economists expect, and the inflation rate implied by government bond prices. It is also one reason it publishes a clear target: the RBA says inflation expectations have been consistent with its target since the early 1990s, and it wants to keep them there. When you hear the RBA say it will 'look through' a temporary price rise, it is betting that expectations stay anchored. When it raises rates in response to a supply shock, it is usually because it fears they will not.

3How a cash rate rise is meant to work

The RBA's main tool is the cash rate, the interest rate on overnight loans between banks. Between May 2022 and November 2023 it raised the cash rate target thirteen times, from 0.10 to 4.35 per cent. Banks pass changes on to mortgages, business loans and deposits.

The RBA describes four main channels through which higher rates slow spending:

  • Saving and investment: borrowing costs more and saving pays more, so households and businesses spend and invest less.
  • Cash flow: people with variable-rate mortgages pay more interest, leaving less for everything else.
  • Asset prices and wealth: higher rates tend to lower house and share prices, so people feel less wealthy and can borrow less against their assets.
  • Exchange rate: higher rates tend to lift the Australian dollar, making imports cheaper.

Less spending means less pressure on prices, and over time weaker demand for workers, which slows wage growth. The RBA says monetary policy takes one to two years to have its full effect, and the timing is uncertain. Notice what this mechanism mainly works on: demand. That is why the source of inflation matters so much in the debates that follow.

4Wages, profits and the rules of the game

Several forces can push prices up at once, and economists argue about their weight.

  • Supply shocks: pandemic shutdowns, shipping bottlenecks, war-driven energy prices and floods.
  • Wages: when wages rise faster than productivity, labour costs per unit of output rise, and firms may pass that on.
  • Profit margins and market power: firms decide how much of a cost increase to pass on. Where a few big firms dominate a market, they may find it easier to raise prices together.
  • Spending: strong household, business and government spending can push demand beyond what the economy can supply.
  • Institutions: many prices are set or adjusted by rules rather than day-to-day competition. The CPI is used to index pensions, some taxes and charges, and business contracts, so past inflation feeds into future prices. Some prices are set by governments or regulators, such as many fees and charges. Governments can lower measured prices directly too: energy bill rebates were the main reason electricity prices fell 9.9 per cent in the December quarter 2024.

No single cause explains every episode. The RBA's framework focuses on demand and expectations, because that is what interest rates act on. Critics in this topic argue profits, market power and supply shocks deserved more attention in 2021–23.

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Lesson 4.1 Beginner12 min video Core about 18 min with questions

Australia's Inflation Target

Reserve Bank of Australia

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to state the RBA's inflation target, explain why it is a goal over time rather than every quarter, and describe how a higher cash rate slows inflation.

Why this matters. The inflation target shapes mortgage rates, job prospects and the cost of living for every Australian. Knowing the official reasoning is the starting point for judging its critics fairly.

Australia's Inflation Target
Play: Australia's Inflation Target (12 minutes, opens YouTube)

The RBA's own eleven-minute explanation of its 2 to 3 per cent inflation target: what inflation is, why rapidly rising and falling prices are both costly, and how the cash rate is used to keep the economy close to its potential. This is the site's mainstream anchor for the topic, so hear the RBA make its case before the critics. It was made when the cash rate was near zero, before the 2022–23 rate rises and before a new Monetary Policy Board took over rate decisions in 2025.

Three things to remember

  1. Official view The target is consumer price inflation of 2 to 3 per cent. The video's older wording says 'on average, over time'; since the December 2023 Statement (renewed in 2025) the RBA aims to return inflation to the 2.5 per cent midpoint over a timeframe that depends on circumstances. Either way, it can look through short-lived shocks.
  2. Official view In the RBA's account, when demand outruns the economy's potential, unemployment falls below its sustainable level, wage growth speeds up and prices rise. Raising the cash rate dampens spending to bring inflation back to target.
  3. Established Before targeting began in the early 1990s, Australian inflation was often high and volatile. Since then it has been lower and more stable. Whether targeting caused that, or other changes did, is still debated.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

Petrol prices jump because of a refinery outage overseas, then settle back within months. According to the RBA video, how should monetary policy respond?

Show the answer

Look through it, because interest rates can't fix a temporary supply disruption, while watching that it doesn't feed into lasting inflation.

Right. Because the target is pursued over time, not every quarter, the RBA can look through short-lived supply shocks and respond only if they start to persist or shift expectations.

From May 2022 to November 2023 the RBA lifted the cash rate from 0.10 to 4.35 per cent. If a $500,000 variable mortgage rate rose by the same amount, how much more interest is due in a year?

Show the working

Answer: $21,250

The rise is 4.35 minus 0.10, which is 4.25 percentage points. 4.25 per cent of $500,000 is $21,250 a year, before any principal repayments. This is the 'cash-flow' channel: money spent on interest is not spent elsewhere, which is how higher rates cool demand.

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Continue learning

The RBA's story starts with demand running ahead of supply. Isabella Weber's short animation offers a different account of how the 2021–23 inflation started.

Next: Sellers Inflation [Isabella Weber]

Lesson 4.2 Beginner4 min video Core about 10 min with questions

Sellers Inflation [Isabella Weber]

Isabella Weber · New Economic Thinking

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to explain how, in Weber's account, a widely publicised cost shock lets many firms raise prices at the same time.

Why this matters. Weber's idea was at the centre of Australia's 2023 'greedflation' debate. You can only judge that debate if you can state her mechanism accurately.

Sellers Inflation [Isabella Weber]
Play: Sellers Inflation [Isabella Weber] (4 minutes, opens YouTube)

A short animation, under four minutes, of Weber's account of the 2021 to 2023 inflation. She argues that big, widely reported cost shocks, such as energy and grain prices after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, let firms raise prices together without fear of losing customers, because everyone could see a reason. It is one influential explanation, not a settled verdict: economists still disagree about whether profits caused that inflation or mostly accompanied it.

Three things to remember

  1. Established The 2021–23 inflation followed large supply shocks: pandemic shutdowns and shortages, then energy and food price spikes after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Most economists agree these shocks played a large part.
  2. Argument Weber argues that a big, shared cost shock works as a coordinating signal: each firm can raise prices knowing its rivals will too, without any explicit cartel, so the shock spreads through the economy.
  3. Argument Weber argues that prices are social relationships: customers accept rises when there is a widely reported reason, such as dearer grain, and cannot tell whether a price rise is bigger than the cost increase behind it.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

In Weber's coffee-shop example, why does the regular customer accept a 50 per cent price rise?

Show the answer

The owner has been talking about a coming rent increase, so the higher price seems justified.

Right. A shared story about rising costs makes customers more accepting, whether or not the price rise matches the cost rise.

The RBA's May 2023 analysis found Australia's aggregate profit share rose strongly from 2021. What did it say drove most of that rise?

Show the answer

Mining profits, lifted by high global commodity prices.

Right. Outside mining, the RBA found little sign of a broad rise in margins to late 2022. The Australia Institute, using a different method, reached a very different conclusion.

Lesson 4.3 Intermediate64 min video Long lecture · optional about 1 h 10 min with questions

Isabella Weber: The Economics and Politics of Seller's Inflation

Isabella Weber · The Australia Institute

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to describe Weber's three stages of sellers' inflation and name one targeted policy she proposes instead of relying on interest rates.

Why this matters. Weber's analysis was used in Australia's 2023 debate over rate rises. This conversation shows what she claims, what she concedes, and what she would do instead.

Isabella Weber: The Economics and Politics of Seller's Inflation
Play: Isabella Weber: The Economics and Politics of Seller's Inflation (64 minutes, opens YouTube)

An hour-long Australia Institute webinar from 2023 in which economist Jim Stanford interviews Weber about sellers' inflation. She sets out her three stages, from upstream price shocks to firms protecting their margins to workers fighting to catch up, and argues for targeted tools such as buffer stocks, price-gouging rules and windfall taxes. Her evidence is mostly from the US and Europe, with Stanford drawing the Australian links; the first few minutes are the audience joining.

Three things to remember

  1. Argument Weber describes three stages: an impulse from upstream sectors such as energy, propagation as firms with pricing power protect or widen margins, and a conflict stage as workers try to recover lost real wages.
  2. Established Keeping the same percentage margin on higher costs raises profits in dollars. Weber stresses this arithmetic: firms need only protect their margins for profits to rise in dollars during a cost shock. Profit's share of the price does not change, which is why studies can find no broad widening of margins while dollar profits grow.
  3. Argument Weber argues for 'disaster preparedness' in essential sectors: buffer stocks, price-gouging rules, windfall taxes and temporary price limits to buy time, rather than mainly raising interest rates, which she says makes workers pay.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

A Newcastle hardware wholesaler adds a 20 per cent margin to its costs. Its cost per item rises from $50 to $60. If it keeps the same percentage margin, by how many dollars does its profit per item rise?

Show the working

Answer: $2

Before: 20 per cent of $50 is $10 profit, so it sells for $60. After: 20 per cent of $60 is $12 profit, so it sells for $72. Profit per item rises by $2 even though the margin is unchanged. This is Weber's point that protecting margins raises profits when costs jump.

Which policy does Weber describe as a way to 'buy time' in an emergency, rather than a fix?

Show the answer

Temporary price limits or price-gouging laws in the sectors hit by the shock.

Right. Drawing on J.K. Galbraith, she says price controls can only buy time for measures, such as boosting supply, that deal with the underlying shortage.

Lesson 4.4 Beginner4 min video Core about 12 min with questions

Professor Bill Mitchell - Inflation Targetting

Bill Mitchell · Bill Mitchell

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to explain Mitchell's claim that inflation targeting displaced full employment as a goal, and give one reason others disagree.

Why this matters. Whether low inflation should come before full employment is partly a question of values. Mitchell, based in Newcastle, is one of Australia's best-known critics of the framework the RBA defended in the first lesson.

Professor Bill Mitchell - Inflation Targetting
Play: Professor Bill Mitchell - Inflation Targetting (4 minutes, opens YouTube)

A four-minute ABC Lateline Business report from July 2012 on the history and politics of Australia's inflation measure, including a short interview with Newcastle economist Bill Mitchell. Mitchell argues that since the early 1990s inflation targeting has pushed aside the goal of full employment and been used to justify tighter budgets. The report also covers the 1998 removal of mortgage interest from the CPI and the case for a monthly CPI, which Australia introduced in 2025.

Three things to remember

  1. Established Australia began targeting average inflation of 2 to 3 per cent in 1993, after high inflation in the 1970s and 1980s and the early 1990s recession.
  2. Established Mortgage interest was removed from the CPI from 1998. As the report notes, otherwise the rate rises meant to bring inflation down would push measured inflation up.
  3. Argument Mitchell argues inflation targeting has meant abandoning the full employment objective without a proper reckoning of the costs, and that in 2012 it was used to justify cutting spending to reach a budget surplus.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

Why did removing mortgage interest from the CPI matter for inflation targeting?

Show the answer

Otherwise, raising rates to fight inflation would directly push the measured CPI up.

Right. With mortgage interest in the index, every rate rise would show up as higher 'inflation', working against the policy it was meant to measure.

Suppose the RBA raises rates to cool demand. Using Mitchell's argument, who bears the cost? What would a supporter of inflation targeting say in reply?

Show a model answer

Mitchell would say the cost falls on people who lose work or hours as spending slows, and on households with large mortgages, while the goal of full employment is treated as secondary. A supporter would reply that high inflation also hurts people, by eroding what wages and savings buy, and that letting it become entrenched would need even more painful measures later. They would add that the RBA's mandate has included full employment since the Reserve Bank Act of 1959, and since the December 2023 Statement it has been set out explicitly alongside price stability, so the RBA is meant to weigh both.

A strong answer

  • Job losses and mortgage holders bear costs of tightening
  • High inflation also has costs for households
  • The RBA's mandate covers both price stability and full employment

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Continue learning

Mitchell's point that unemployment is used to hold inflation down leads straight into Topic 5, which looks at unemployment as a policy choice, the NAIRU and the Job Guarantee.

Next: where this topic is contested

The big debate in this topic

Was Australia's 2021–23 inflation mainly about too much demand, or about supply shocks?

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Where this leads. Because the RBA fights inflation partly by slowing the demand for workers, Topic 5 looks at unemployment as a policy choice, the NAIRU and the Job Guarantee.