Progressive Money

Topic 1 of 8

What is money?

Start here. What money is today (cash, bank deposits and central bank money), the competing accounts of where it came from, and why people accept a currency at all.

4 lessons · about 1 h 5 min with activities, 2 h 25 min with the long lectures · beginner first

Before the videos

Key ideas for this topic

You start with the Bank of England's plain account of modern money as a set of IOUs, then Brett Scott's case against the textbook barter story. Stephanie Kelton's classroom experiment shows the tax-driven theory of why people accept a currency, and Randall Wray's optional lecture gives the history and theory behind it.

Builds on: This is where the site starts: no prior topic is assumed, only curiosity about what money is.

Ideas you'll need

1Three kinds of money in Australia

When people say "money" they usually mean one of three things, and each is a promise from a different institution.

  • Cash. Australian banknotes are issued by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and count as its liability: something the RBA owes the holder. Coins are issued separately and are not an RBA liability.
  • Bank deposits. The balance in your account is what your bank owes you. This is most of the money Australians use. In mid-2018 the public held about $74 billion in notes and coins, out of roughly $2.1 trillion of broad money: about 3.5 per cent.
  • Settlement balances. Banks hold accounts at the RBA called exchange settlement accounts, and use the balances in them (often called reserves) to settle payments with each other. Households and ordinary businesses cannot hold them.

When you transfer $50 from your bank to a friend at a different bank, your deposit falls and your friend's rises. Behind the scenes, your bank pays your friend's bank by moving settlement balances at the RBA. The Australian Government's own payments and tax receipts run through these accounts too, which matters in Topic 2.

2Money as an IOU: reading a balance sheet

A balance sheet lists what someone owns (their assets) and what they owe (their liabilities). The idea that unlocks the rest of this site is simple: every financial asset is someone else's liability.

Suppose you have $1,000 in a savings account. On your balance sheet it is an asset, money you own. On your bank's balance sheet the same $1,000 is a liability, money it owes you. A $50 note in your wallet works the same way: an asset to you, a liability of the RBA.

That is why the Bank of England calls modern money an IOU, short for "I owe you". The question "what is money?" becomes "whose promise is it, and why do people trust it?" A promise from the RBA is accepted almost everywhere in Australia. A promise from a big bank is accepted nearly as widely, partly because the bank must turn it into cash on request. A promise from your neighbour is accepted only by people who know them.

Thinking in balance sheets also helps you check claims. If someone says money was "created", ask: whose asset went up, and whose liability went up with it?

3Three theories of where money came from

How money began is a historical question, and there are three main theories. They rest on different evidence, and none is settled fact.

  • Commodity theory. Adam Smith and later Carl Menger argued that money grew out of barter: traders came to accept the most widely wanted goods, such as metals, and these became money. This is the story most textbooks still tell.
  • Credit theory. Alfred Mitchell-Innes, writing in 1913, argued that money began as records of debts, and that buying and selling create credits and debts measured in a unit of account.
  • State theory, or chartalism. Georg Friedrich Knapp argued that money is whatever the state accepts in payment, especially for taxes and fines.

What does the evidence show? Anthropologists have not found a society that ran mainly on barter before money. The earliest Mesopotamian records, thousands of years older than coins, are accounts of goods and dues. The earliest known coins in the Mediterranean world appear in Lydia, in today's Turkey, in the seventh century BCE; China and India developed coinage independently within a century or two. This weighs heavily against barter as history, but it does not decide between the credit and state theories, and many historians combine them. MMT economists draw on both.

4Why do Australians accept the dollar?

A banknote costs little to print and cannot be swapped for gold, yet people work hard to earn Australian dollars. Why?

Several reasons work together:

  • The law. Australian banknotes are legal tender, although businesses can usually set other payment terms in advance.
  • Taxes. Tax debts to the Australian Government are owed in Australian dollars, so everyone with a tax bill needs them.
  • Everyone else uses it. Wages, rents, prices and loans are all written in dollars, so it is the obvious thing to accept.
  • It holds its value. People accept dollars today because they expect them to buy roughly as much next month. Keeping that trust is a central bank's job.

Economists weigh these differently. MMT economists argue the tax obligation is the foundation: it guarantees demand for the currency and so gives it value. Many others treat taxes as one support among several, and put more weight on trust, habit and the central bank keeping inflation low. The Bank of England's 2014 paper mentions both taxes and trust. Kelton's video in this topic makes the case for taxes; keep the alternatives in mind as you watch.

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Lesson 1.1 Beginner5 min video Core about 11 min with questions

Money in the modern economy: an introduction - Quarterly Bulletin

Bank of England

Also step 1 of Start here. If you've done it there, it counts here too.

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to explain why a banknote and a bank deposit are both IOUs, and say who owes what to whom in each case.

Why this matters. Most arguments about budgets and banks assume we already know what money is. This site builds on the Bank of England's own description: modern money is a set of promises, mostly bank deposits, not a stock of gold or notes.

Money in the modern economy: an introduction - Quarterly Bulletin
Play: Money in the modern economy: an introduction - Quarterly Bulletin (5 minutes, opens YouTube)

Five minutes from the Bank of England, filmed in its gold vaults, on what money is today. Notes and coins are IOUs from the central bank, the money in your bank account is an IOU from your bank, and in the UK bank deposits make up about 97 per cent of the money people hold. It is a central bank's own plain account of money, which makes it a sound place to start.

Three things to remember

  1. Established Most money in Australia is bank deposits, not cash. In mid-2018 the public held about $74 billion in notes and coins, out of roughly $2.1 trillion of broad money.
  2. Official view The Bank of England describes both kinds of money as IOUs: a banknote is a liability of the central bank, and your deposit is your bank's debt to you, which it must pay in cash on request.
  3. Argument Radia argues that money works because it is a special IOU that everyone trusts, so strangers need not rely on each other's personal promises. Keeping that trust means stable value and notes that are hard to forge.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

In mid-2018 Australians held about $74 billion in notes and coins, and broad money was about $2,100 billion. Roughly what percentage of broad money was cash? Round to one decimal place.

Show the working

Answer: 3.5%

74 ÷ 2,100 is about 0.035, or 3.5 per cent. Almost all the rest is deposits with banks and other lenders: promises from those institutions to you, not from the Reserve Bank. Australia's split is close to the 97 per cent deposits figure in the video.

You have $500 in an everyday bank account. In the video's terms, what is that $500?

Show the answer

A debt your bank owes you, which you can turn into cash on request

Right. A deposit is the bank's IOU to you. It works as money because you can spend it by card or transfer, or withdraw it as notes, which are the Reserve Bank's IOU.

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Continue learning

The Bank's farmer and fisherman are an imagined example. Next, Brett Scott asks where the older textbook story, that money replaced barter, came from, and why anthropologists reject it.

Next: The MYTH of Barter, and why it harms us

Lesson 1.2 Beginner25 min video Core about 33 min with questions

The MYTH of Barter, and why it harms us

Brett Scott

Also step 2 of Start here. If you've done it there, it counts here too.

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to explain what the 'barter myth' claims, why anthropologists reject it as history, and what Scott means by presentism.

Why this matters. Where you think money came from shapes what you think it is. If money is a neutral tool that replaced swapping, governments and banks look like bystanders; if it grew out of obligations and institutions, they are central to the story.

The MYTH of Barter, and why it harms us
Play: The MYTH of Barter, and why it harms us (25 minutes, opens YouTube)

Brett Scott, a writer with a background in economic anthropology, takes apart the opening story of many economics textbooks: that people once lived by barter and invented money to escape its hassles. He shows how Adam Smith and William Stanley Jevons imagined that past from their armchairs, and argues the story props up a picture of the economy as a crowd of detached individuals. Twenty-five minutes, and he is careful to say barter did happen, just never as the main way a society worked.

Three things to remember

  1. Established Anthropologists have not found a society where barter was the main way of getting things before money. Barter has happened, and still does, but alongside gifts, shared obligations and credit.
  2. Official view The barter story is still standard teaching: Scott quotes textbooks from 1999 to 2018, and the RBA's own Econ-essentials video for schools introduces money through bartering.
  3. Argument Scott argues the myth comes from presentism: imagining today's market economy with money subtracted. He says it supports a view of people as independent individuals who can freely walk away, which hides power.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

When anthropologists call barter a myth, what exactly are they rejecting?

Show the answer

That barter was the main way people traded before money, and that money was invented to fix it

Yes. The target is a two-part story: barter came first as the dominant system, and its inconvenience explains money's origin. Scott says both parts lack evidence.

Use Scott's Los Angeles car example to explain 'presentism' in your own words, then apply it to the barter story.

Show a model answer

Presentism means taking features of today's world for granted and projecting them back onto the past. A teenager in sprawling Los Angeles might imagine life before cars as people walking 35 miles to work, but before cars people did not live that far from work: the car created the sprawl. The barter story does the same thing. It imagines a modern economy of specialised strangers, removes money, notes how awkward that would be, and calls it history. But that kind of economy probably could not have existed without money, so it cannot explain where money came from.

A strong answer

  • Defines presentism as reading the present into the past
  • Notes that the car example removes one feature but keeps others (long commutes) that the car itself caused
  • Applies the same logic: a specialised market economy without money is not a real past

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Continue learning

If money did not grow out of barter, why do people accept it at all? Next, Stephanie Kelton builds a currency from scratch in a lecture room to show one answer: taxes.

Next: How To Create A Currency From Scratch (Long Version)

Lesson 1.3 Beginner10 min video Core about 16 min with questions

How To Create A Currency From Scratch (Long Version)

Stephanie Kelton · Deficit Owls

Also step 3 of Start here. If you've done it there, it counts here too.

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to use Kelton's classroom example to explain why, in her account, spending comes before tax payments, and where a deficit ends up.

Why this matters. Kelton's experiment links two ideas this site keeps returning to: why people want a currency at all, and why one sector's deficit is always another sector's surplus.

How To Create A Currency From Scratch (Long Version)
Play: How To Create A Currency From Scratch (Long Version) (10 minutes, opens YouTube)

Kelton turns a lecture room into an imaginary country with its own currency. As the government, she imposes a tax payable only in that currency, shows that nobody can pay it until she has spent some into existence, and tracks where the money ends up when she spends more than she taxes. Ten minutes, filmed while she was at the University of Missouri–Kansas City, with US examples: a vivid first look at the idea that taxes create demand for a currency.

Three things to remember

  1. Established If a government spends 500 units and taxes 200 back, everyone else ends up holding 300 more. A government deficit equals the non-government sector's surplus, to the dollar: that is accounting.
  2. Established Adding trade does not break the rule. If households import, part of their surplus goes overseas; the balances of government, domestic private sector and rest of the world always sum to zero.
  3. Argument Kelton argues that a tax payable only in the government's currency is what makes people want it, so the government must supply the currency before anyone can pay. This is chartalism, a theory, not settled fact.

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

Imagine a year when the Australian Government spends $700 billion and collects $660 billion in taxes, and Australia has no trade with the rest of the world. By how much do the financial assets of households and businesses rise?

Show the working

Answer: $40 billion

$700 billion − $660 billion = $40 billion. The government's $40 billion deficit is matched exactly by a $40 billion surplus for everyone else. With trade, part of that surplus would go to the rest of the world instead.

In Kelton's classroom country, why can't the 'citizens' pay their 200-unit tax at first?

Show the answer

No units of the currency exist outside the government yet

Yes. The currency is the government's own creation, so the only way to get it is from the government: she hires people to build roads and pays them, and only then can taxes be paid.

Lesson 1.4 Intermediate72 min video Long lecture · optional about 1 h 20 min with questions

Professor L Randall Wray | The History and Nature of Money | January 2024

L. Randall Wray · Modern Money Lab

Before you watch

After watching this video, you should be able to describe the credit theory and the state theory of money, and give one historical example Wray uses for each.

Why this matters. Wray supplies the historical case behind MMT's view of money. Knowing which parts rest on archaeology, which on his reading of it, and which are theory helps you judge the rest of the site.

Professor L Randall Wray | The History and Nature of Money | January 2024
Play: Professor L Randall Wray | The History and Nature of Money | January 2024 (72 minutes, opens YouTube)

Wray's online lecture for Modern Money Lab, an Adelaide-based MMT education charity, argues that money has always been a record of debt in a unit of account set by authorities. He moves from Mesopotamian tokens and tablets through wergild, tally sticks and American colonial paper money redeemed by taxes, then sets out where he sees MMT's roots. About 45 minutes of talk and 25 of questions, 72 in all; Wray says he is a reader, not a specialist, of ancient history.

Three things to remember

  1. Established The earliest Mesopotamian records were accounts: clay tokens counted goods such as grain and livestock, and some recorded dues owed. Coins came thousands of years later: the earliest known Mediterranean coins are from Lydia, in the seventh century BCE, and China and India developed coinage independently soon after.
  2. Argument Wray, drawing on Innes and Knapp, argues money is not a thing but a record of debt in a unit of account, and that a state gives its money value by accepting it back in taxes.
  3. Argument Wray argues that taxes and bond sales do not fund government spending: spending comes first, taxes 'redeem' the currency and bond sales drain bank reserves. Treasury describes this differently (Topic 2).

Can you explain it?

Optional. Try as often as you like; nothing is scored or sent anywhere.

Wray says cryptocurrency is not money. Which reason does he give?

Show the answer

It is nobody's IOU, so no issuer has to accept it back

Yes. For Wray, money is a debt that its issuer must accept back in payment (redemption). A crypto token has no issuer who owes anything, so on his definition it does not qualify.

Explain the difference between the credit theory and the state theory of money, using Wray's pizza coupon or colonial paper money examples.

Show a model answer

The credit theory says money is a record of debt: whoever issues it owes something to whoever holds it, and must accept it back. Wray's pizza coupon fits this: the pizzeria owes a pizza to the coupon holder, and once the coupon comes back it is cancelled. The state theory says a government decides what counts as money and creates demand for it by requiring taxes to be paid in it. The colonial paper money fits this: colonies passed one law issuing notes and another imposing taxes payable in those notes, which were burned when they came back. Wray combines both: state money is the government's IOU, redeemed through taxes.

A strong answer

  • Credit theory: money as an IOU that the issuer must accept back
  • State theory: the state chooses the money and creates demand for it through taxes
  • A correct example for each, and how Wray links the two

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Continue learning

Topic 2 starts with Kelton's TED talk, which applies these ideas to a modern government's budget: if the government issues the currency, what does a deficit actually mean?

Next: where this topic is contested

The big debate in this topic

Where did money come from: barter, credit or the state?

Saved in this browser only. It records that you marked it, nothing more.

Where this leads. Topic 2 applies these ideas to the Australian Government: if it issues the currency, what are its deficits, debt and bonds, and what actually limits its spending?

Go further (optional, more advanced)